GHSA-MMQ8-M72Q-QGM4
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-02 04:01 – Updated: 2025-04-20 03:34
VLAI?
Details
DL::dlopen in Ruby 1.8, 1.9.0, 1.9.2, 1.9.3, 2.0.0 before patchlevel 648, and 2.1 before 2.1.8 opens libraries with tainted names.
Severity ?
7.3 (High)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2009-5147"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-20"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2017-03-29T14:59:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "DL::dlopen in Ruby 1.8, 1.9.0, 1.9.2, 1.9.3, 2.0.0 before patchlevel 648, and 2.1 before 2.1.8 opens libraries with tainted names.",
"id": "GHSA-mmq8-m72q-qgm4",
"modified": "2025-04-20T03:34:58Z",
"published": "2022-05-02T04:01:41Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2009-5147"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/ruby/ruby/commit/4600cf725a86ce31266153647ae5aa1197b1215b"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0583"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1248935"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2015/12/16/unsafe-tainted-string-usage-in-fiddle-and-dl-cve-2015-7551"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2015/q3/222"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/76060"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…