GHSA-MMRV-P6CV-33XM
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 00:59 – Updated: 2025-04-12 12:46
VLAI?
Details
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in system_firmware_restorefullbackup.php in the WebGUI in pfSense before 2.2.1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that delete arbitrary files via the deletefile parameter.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2015-2295"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2015-04-10T15:00:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in system_firmware_restorefullbackup.php in the WebGUI in pfSense before 2.2.1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that delete arbitrary files via the deletefile parameter.",
"id": "GHSA-mmrv-p6cv-33xm",
"modified": "2025-04-12T12:46:59Z",
"published": "2022-05-14T00:59:54Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-2295"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/36506"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.htbridge.com/advisory/HTB23251"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.pfsense.org/security/advisories/pfSense-SA-15_04.webgui.asc"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/131022/pfSense-2.2-Cross-Site-Request-Forgery-Cross-Site-Scripting.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/534987/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/73344"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…