ghsa-mp99-gxqh-6752
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-24 17:04
Modified
2022-05-24 17:04
Severity ?
Details
SQLite 3.30.1 mishandles certain parser-tree rewriting, related to expr.c, vdbeaux.c, and window.c. This is caused by incorrect sqlite3WindowRewrite() error handling.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2019-19924", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-755", ], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2019-12-24T16:15:00Z", severity: "MODERATE", }, details: "SQLite 3.30.1 mishandles certain parser-tree rewriting, related to expr.c, vdbeaux.c, and window.c. This is caused by incorrect sqlite3WindowRewrite() error handling.", id: "GHSA-mp99-gxqh-6752", modified: "2022-05-24T17:04:59Z", published: "2022-05-24T17:04:59Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-19924", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://github.com/sqlite/sqlite/commit/8654186b0236d556aa85528c2573ee0b6ab71be3", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-389290.pdf", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r58af02e294bd07f487e2c64ffc0a29b837db5600e33b6e698b9d696b@%3Cissues.bookkeeper.apache.org%3E", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf4c02775860db415b4955778a131c2795223f61cb8c6a450893651e4@%3Cissues.bookkeeper.apache.org%3E", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20200114-0003", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://usn.ubuntu.com/4298-1", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2020.html", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N", type: "CVSS_V3", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.