GHSA-MR5M-24G3-RXXV
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 03:35 – Updated: 2025-04-11 04:16
VLAI
Details
The avcodec_decode_audio4 function in libavcodec/utils.c in FFmpeg before 1.0.4 and 1.1.x before 1.1.1 allows remote attackers to trigger memory corruption via vectors related to the channel layout.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2013-0861"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-119"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2013-11-23T18:55:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The avcodec_decode_audio4 function in libavcodec/utils.c in FFmpeg before 1.0.4 and 1.1.x before 1.1.1 allows remote attackers to trigger memory corruption via vectors related to the channel layout.",
"id": "GHSA-mr5m-24g3-rxxv",
"modified": "2025-04-11T04:16:22Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T03:35:03Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2013-0861"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201603-06"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://git.videolan.org/?p=ffmpeg.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=43c6b45a53a186a187f7266e4d6bd3c2620519f1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://git.videolan.org/?p=ffmpeg.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=4cd1dad91ae97fe1f0dd534c3f5566787566f137"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://git.videolan.org/?p=ffmpeg.git;a=commitdiff;h=43c6b45a53a186a187f7266e4d6bd3c2620519f1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://git.videolan.org/?p=ffmpeg.git;a=commitdiff;h=4cd1dad91ae97fe1f0dd534c3f5566787566f137"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.ffmpeg.org/security.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…