ghsa-mvfq-76qv-w62r
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 04:20
Modified
2022-05-17 04:20
Details

Server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the cmisbrowser servlet in Content Management Interoperability Service (CMIS) in Alfresco Community Edition 5.0.a and earlier allows remote attackers to trigger outbound requests via a crafted URI in the url parameter.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2014-9302"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2014-12-07T21:59:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the cmisbrowser servlet in Content Management Interoperability Service (CMIS) in Alfresco Community Edition 5.0.a and earlier allows remote attackers to trigger outbound requests via a crafted URI in the url parameter.",
  "id": "GHSA-mvfq-76qv-w62r",
  "modified": "2022-05-17T04:20:20Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T04:20:20Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-9302"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.sec-consult.com/fxdata/seccons/prod/temedia/advisories_txt/20140716-0_Alfresco_Community_Edition_Multiple_SSRF_vulnerabilities_v10.txt"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://seclists.org/bugtraq/2014/Jul/72"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.