GHSA-MVQP-Q37C-WF9J
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2019-10-21 16:08 – Updated: 2022-09-17 00:25CWE-113: Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences in HTTP Headers ('HTTP Response Splitting')
Versions of Ratpack 0.9.1 through and including 1.7.4 are vulnerable to HTTP Response Splitting, if untrusted and unsanitized data is used to populate the headers of an HTTP response. An attacker can utilize this vulnerability to have the server issue any HTTP response they specify.
If your application uses arbitrary user input as the value of a response header it is vulnerable. If your application does not use arbitrary values as response header values, it is not vulnerable.
Previously, Ratpack did not validate response header values. Now, adding a header value that contains the header value termination characters (CRLF) produces a runtime exception. Since there is no mechanism for escaping or encoding the termination characters in a String, a runtime exception is necessary.
As potentially dangerous values now cause runtime exceptions, it is a good idea to continue to validate and sanitize any user-supplied values being used as response headers.
We would like to thank Jonathan Leitschuh for reporting this vulnerability.
Vulnerable Example
The following example server uses a query parameter value as a response header, without validating or sanitizing it.
RatpackServer startedServer = RatpackServer.start(server -> {
server.handlers(chain -> chain.all(ctx -> {
// User supplied query parameter
String header = ctx.getRequest().getQueryParams().get("header");
// User supplied data used to populate a header value.
ctx.header("the-header", header)
.render("OK!");
}));
});
Sending a request to the server with the following value for the header query param would allow the execution of arbitrary Javascript.
Content-Type: text/html
X-XSS-Protection: 0
<script>alert(document.domain)</script>
Impact
- Cross-User Defacement
- Cache Poisoning
- Cross-Site Scripting
- Page Hijacking
Patches
This vulnerability has been patched in Ratpack version 1.7.5.
Root Cause
The root cause was due to using the netty DefaultHttpHeaders object with verification disabled.
https://github.com/ratpack/ratpack/blob/af1e8c8590f164d7dd84d4212886fad4ead99080/ratpack-core/src/main/java/ratpack/server/internal/NettyHandlerAdapter.java#L159
This vulnerability is now more clearly documented in the Netty documentation: https://github.com/netty/netty/pull/9646
Workarounds
The workaround for this vulnerability is to either not use arbitrary input as response header values or validate such values before being used to ensure they don't contain a carriage return and/or line feed characters.
References
- CWE-113: Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences in HTTP Headers ('HTTP Response Splitting')
- Fix commit: https://github.com/ratpack/ratpack/commit/efb910d38a96494256f36675ef0e5061097dd77d
For more information
If you have any questions or comments about this advisory: * Open an issue in ratpack/ratpack * Ask in our Slack channel
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "io.ratpack:ratpack-core"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.7.5"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2019-17513"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-74"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2020-06-16T21:47:20Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "## CWE-113: Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences in HTTP Headers (\u0027HTTP Response Splitting\u0027)\n\nVersions of Ratpack 0.9.1 through and including 1.7.4 are vulnerable to [HTTP Response Splitting](https://www.owasp.org/index.php/HTTP_Response_Splitting), \nif untrusted and unsanitized data is used to populate the headers of an HTTP response.\nAn attacker can utilize this vulnerability to have the server issue any HTTP response they specify.\n\nIf your application uses arbitrary user input as the value of a response header it is vulnerable.\nIf your application does not use arbitrary values as response header values, it is not vulnerable.\n\nPreviously, Ratpack did not validate response header values.\nNow, adding a header value that contains the header value termination characters (CRLF) produces a runtime exception.\nSince there is no mechanism for escaping or encoding the termination characters in a String, a runtime exception is necessary.\n\nAs potentially dangerous values now cause runtime exceptions, it is a good idea to continue to validate and sanitize any user-supplied values being used as response headers.\n\nWe would like to thank [Jonathan Leitschuh](https://github.com/JLLeitschuh) for reporting this vulnerability.\n\n### Vulnerable Example\n\nThe following example server uses a query parameter value as a response header, without validating or sanitizing it.\n```java\nRatpackServer startedServer = RatpackServer.start(server -\u003e {\n server.handlers(chain -\u003e chain.all(ctx -\u003e {\n // User supplied query parameter\n String header = ctx.getRequest().getQueryParams().get(\"header\");\n // User supplied data used to populate a header value.\n ctx.header(\"the-header\", header)\n .render(\"OK!\");\n }));\n});\n```\n\nSending a request to the server with the following value for the `header` query param would allow the execution of arbitrary Javascript.\n\n```\nContent-Type: text/html\nX-XSS-Protection: 0\n\n\u003cscript\u003ealert(document.domain)\u003c/script\u003e\n```\n\n### Impact\n\n- Cross-User Defacement\n- Cache Poisoning\n- Cross-Site Scripting\n- Page Hijacking\n\n### Patches\n\nThis vulnerability has been patched in Ratpack version 1.7.5.\n\n### Root Cause\n\nThe root cause was due to using the netty `DefaultHttpHeaders` object with verification disabled.\n\nhttps://github.com/ratpack/ratpack/blob/af1e8c8590f164d7dd84d4212886fad4ead99080/ratpack-core/src/main/java/ratpack/server/internal/NettyHandlerAdapter.java#L159\n\nThis vulnerability is now more clearly documented in the Netty documentation: https://github.com/netty/netty/pull/9646\n\n### Workarounds\n\nThe workaround for this vulnerability is to either not use arbitrary input as response header values or validate such values before being used to ensure they don\u0027t contain a carriage return and/or line feed characters.\n\n### References\n\n - [CWE-113: Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences in HTTP Headers (\u0027HTTP Response Splitting\u0027)](https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/113.html)\n - Fix commit: https://github.com/ratpack/ratpack/commit/efb910d38a96494256f36675ef0e5061097dd77d\n \n### For more information\n\nIf you have any questions or comments about this advisory:\n* Open an issue in [ratpack/ratpack](https://github.com/ratpack/ratpack/issues)\n* Ask in our [Slack channel](https://slack-signup.ratpack.io/)",
"id": "GHSA-mvqp-q37c-wf9j",
"modified": "2022-09-17T00:25:18Z",
"published": "2019-10-21T16:08:43Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/ratpack/ratpack/security/advisories/GHSA-mvqp-q37c-wf9j"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-17513"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/ratpack/ratpack/commit/c560a8d10cb8bdd7a526c1ca2e67c8f224ca23ae"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/ratpack/ratpack/commit/efb910d38a96494256f36675ef0e5061097dd77d"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-mvqp-q37c-wf9j"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/ratpack/ratpack"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/ratpack/ratpack/releases/tag/v1.7.5"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://ratpack.io/versions/1.7.5"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "io.ratpack:ratpack-core vulnerable to Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output (\u0027Injection\u0027)"
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.