GHSA-MW92-WF4M-J9CJ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 00:48 – Updated: 2022-05-17 00:48
VLAI?
Details
The web interface in Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) 1.1(4.1), 1.3(106.146), and 1.3(120.135) does not properly restrict use of IFRAME elements, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct clickjacking attacks and unspecified other attacks via a crafted web site, related to a "cross-frame scripting (XFS)" issue, aka Bug ID CSCut04556.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2015-4266"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-20"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2015-07-16T19:59:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The web interface in Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) 1.1(4.1), 1.3(106.146), and 1.3(120.135) does not properly restrict use of IFRAME elements, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct clickjacking attacks and unspecified other attacks via a crafted web site, related to a \"cross-frame scripting (XFS)\" issue, aka Bug ID CSCut04556.",
"id": "GHSA-mw92-wf4m-j9cj",
"modified": "2022-05-17T00:48:54Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T00:48:54Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-4266"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/viewAlert.x?alertId=39871"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1032930"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…