ghsa-mxh3-93ph-p9r2
Vulnerability from github
BIND servers are vulnerable if they are running an affected version and are configured to use GSS-TSIG features. In a configuration which uses BIND's default settings the vulnerable code path is not exposed, but a server can be rendered vulnerable by explicitly setting valid values for the tkey-gssapi-keytab or tkey-gssapi-credentialconfiguration options. Although the default configuration is not vulnerable, GSS-TSIG is frequently used in networks where BIND is integrated with Samba, as well as in mixed-server environments that combine BIND servers with Active Directory domain controllers. The most likely outcome of a successful exploitation of the vulnerability is a crash of the named process. However, remote code execution, while unproven, is theoretically possible. Affects: BIND 9.5.0 -> 9.11.27, 9.12.0 -> 9.16.11, and versions BIND 9.11.3-S1 -> 9.11.27-S1 and 9.16.8-S1 -> 9.16.11-S1 of BIND Supported Preview Edition. Also release versions 9.17.0 -> 9.17.1 of the BIND 9.17 development branch
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2020-8625" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-120" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2021-02-17T23:15:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "BIND servers are vulnerable if they are running an affected version and are configured to use GSS-TSIG features. In a configuration which uses BIND\u0027s default settings the vulnerable code path is not exposed, but a server can be rendered vulnerable by explicitly setting valid values for the tkey-gssapi-keytab or tkey-gssapi-credentialconfiguration options. Although the default configuration is not vulnerable, GSS-TSIG is frequently used in networks where BIND is integrated with Samba, as well as in mixed-server environments that combine BIND servers with Active Directory domain controllers. The most likely outcome of a successful exploitation of the vulnerability is a crash of the named process. However, remote code execution, while unproven, is theoretically possible. Affects: BIND 9.5.0 -\u003e 9.11.27, 9.12.0 -\u003e 9.16.11, and versions BIND 9.11.3-S1 -\u003e 9.11.27-S1 and 9.16.8-S1 -\u003e 9.16.11-S1 of BIND Supported Preview Edition. Also release versions 9.17.0 -\u003e 9.17.1 of the BIND 9.17 development branch", "id": "GHSA-mxh3-93ph-p9r2", "modified": "2022-05-24T17:42:36Z", "published": "2022-05-24T17:42:36Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-8625" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-389290.pdf" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://kb.isc.org/v1/docs/cve-2020-8625" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/02/msg00029.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/EBTPWRQWRQEJNWY4NHO4WLS4KLJ3ERHZ" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/KYXAF7G45RXDVNUTWWCI2CVTHRZ67LST" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/QWCMBOSZOJIIET7BWTRYS3HLX5TSDKHX" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20210319-0001" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2021/dsa-4857" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-21-195" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/02/19/1" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/02/20/2" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.