GHSA-P2FC-GRWR-W3X3

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 02:06 – Updated: 2022-05-01 02:06
VLAI?
Details

Cisco CallManager (CCM) 3.2 and earlier, 3.3 before 3.3(5), 4.0 before 4.0(2a)SR2b, and 4.1 4.1 before 4.1(3)SR1 does not quickly time out Realtime Information Server Data Collection (RISDC) sockets, which results in a "resource leak" that allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory and connection consumption) in RisDC.exe.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2005-2241"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2005-07-12T04:00:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Cisco CallManager (CCM) 3.2 and earlier, 3.3 before 3.3(5), 4.0 before 4.0(2a)SR2b, and 4.1 4.1 before 4.1(3)SR1 does not quickly time out Realtime Information Server Data Collection (RISDC) sockets, which results in a \"resource leak\" that allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory and connection consumption) in RisDC.exe.",
  "id": "GHSA-p2fc-grwr-w3x3",
  "modified": "2022-05-01T02:06:10Z",
  "published": "2022-05-01T02:06:10Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2005-2241"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20050712-ccm.shtml"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/14250"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…