GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-P2WC-GRC5-CWHM

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-25 12:31 – Updated: 2026-09-03 18:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

bpf: Allow LPM map access from sleepable BPF programs

trie_lookup_elem() annotates its rcu_dereference_check() walks with only rcu_read_lock_bh_held(). Because rcu_dereference_check(p, c) resolves to "c || rcu_read_lock_held()", this passes for XDP/NAPI and classic RCU readers but fails for sleepable BPF programs, which enter via __bpf_prog_enter_sleepable() and hold only rcu_read_lock_trace().

trie_update_elem() and trie_delete_elem() have the same problem in a different form: they walk the trie with plain rcu_dereference(), which asserts rcu_read_lock_held() unconditionally. Both are reachable from sleepable BPF programs via the bpf_map_update_elem / bpf_map_delete_elem helpers, and from the syscall path under classic rcu_read_lock(). In the writer paths the trie is actually protected by trie->lock (an rqspinlock taken across the walk); we never relied on the RCU read-side lock to keep nodes alive there.

A sleepable LSM hook that ends up touching an LPM trie therefore triggers lockdep on debug kernels:

============================= WARNING: suspicious RCU usage 7.1.0-... Tainted: G E


kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c:249 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage! 1 lock held by net_tests/540: #0: (rcu_tasks_trace_srcu_struct){....}-{0:0}, at: __bpf_prog_enter_sleepable+0x26/0x280 Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl lockdep_rcu_suspicious trie_lookup_elem bpf_prog_...enforce_security_socket_connect bpf_trampoline... security_socket_connect __sys_connect do_syscall_64

This is lockdep-only -- no UAF, since Tasks Trace RCU does serialize against the trie's reclaim path -- but it spams the console once per distinct callsite on every debug kernel running a sleepable BPF LSM that touches an LPM trie, which is increasingly common.

For the lookup path, switch the rcu_dereference_check() annotation from rcu_read_lock_bh_held() to bpf_rcu_lock_held(), which accepts all three contexts (classic, BH, Tasks Trace). Other map types already follow this convention.

For trie_update_elem() and trie_delete_elem(), annotate the walks as rcu_dereference_protected(*p, 1) -- matching trie_free() in the same file -- since trie->lock is held across the walk. rqspinlock has no lockdep_map, so the predicate degenerates to '1' rather than lockdep_is_held(&trie->lock); the protection is real but not machine-verifiable. trie_get_next_key() also uses bare rcu_dereference() but is reachable only from the BPF syscall, which holds classic rcu_read_lock() before dispatching, so it is left untouched.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-64352"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-416"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-07-25T10:17:17Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nbpf: Allow LPM map access from sleepable BPF programs\n\ntrie_lookup_elem() annotates its rcu_dereference_check() walks with\nonly rcu_read_lock_bh_held().  Because rcu_dereference_check(p, c)\nresolves to \"c || rcu_read_lock_held()\", this passes for XDP/NAPI and\nclassic RCU readers but fails for sleepable BPF programs, which enter\nvia __bpf_prog_enter_sleepable() and hold only rcu_read_lock_trace().\n\ntrie_update_elem() and trie_delete_elem() have the same problem in a\ndifferent form: they walk the trie with plain rcu_dereference(), which\nasserts rcu_read_lock_held() unconditionally.  Both are reachable from\nsleepable BPF programs via the bpf_map_update_elem / bpf_map_delete_elem\nhelpers, and from the syscall path under classic rcu_read_lock().  In\nthe writer paths the trie is actually protected by trie-\u003elock (an\nrqspinlock taken across the walk); we never relied on the RCU read-side\nlock to keep nodes alive there.\n\nA sleepable LSM hook that ends up touching an LPM trie therefore\ntriggers lockdep on debug kernels:\n\n  =============================\n  WARNING: suspicious RCU usage\n  7.1.0-... Tainted: G            E\n  -----------------------------\n  kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c:249 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!\n  1 lock held by net_tests/540:\n   #0: (rcu_tasks_trace_srcu_struct){....}-{0:0},\n       at: __bpf_prog_enter_sleepable+0x26/0x280\n  Call Trace:\n   dump_stack_lvl\n   lockdep_rcu_suspicious\n   trie_lookup_elem\n   bpf_prog_..._enforce_security_socket_connect\n   bpf_trampoline_...\n   security_socket_connect\n   __sys_connect\n   do_syscall_64\n\nThis is lockdep-only -- no UAF, since Tasks Trace RCU does serialize\nagainst the trie\u0027s reclaim path -- but it spams the console once per\ndistinct callsite on every debug kernel running a sleepable BPF LSM\nthat touches an LPM trie, which is increasingly common.\n\nFor the lookup path, switch the rcu_dereference_check() annotation\nfrom rcu_read_lock_bh_held() to bpf_rcu_lock_held(), which accepts all\nthree contexts (classic, BH, Tasks Trace).  Other map types already\nfollow this convention.\n\nFor trie_update_elem() and trie_delete_elem(), annotate the walks as\nrcu_dereference_protected(*p, 1) -- matching trie_free() in the same\nfile -- since trie-\u003elock is held across the walk.  rqspinlock has no\nlockdep_map, so the predicate degenerates to \u00271\u0027 rather than\nlockdep_is_held(\u0026trie-\u003elock); the protection is real but not\nmachine-verifiable.  trie_get_next_key() also uses bare\nrcu_dereference() but is reachable only from the BPF syscall, which\nholds classic rcu_read_lock() before dispatching, so it is left\nuntouched.",
  "id": "GHSA-p2wc-grc5-cwhm",
  "modified": "2026-09-03T18:31:17Z",
  "published": "2026-07-25T12:31:32Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-64352"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2f884d371fafea137afea504d49ee4a7c8d7985b"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/304ca50582f0c047370f85e13caec456f78c9fcc"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/57454944737f3ad9a8703aecbbb79713b513a94b"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9bfdf4b81b0e56d47bc6c46c34a46638be716695"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bd6ad9a6b30498d845413e863fb95c6fab3babe3"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ec662a8b2cde01e76b37ccd4b992d0342299e69c"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f0967d4f1ba4323a3cb7dc8fdba74dd3a8caaf04"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…