GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-P3PR-3QQ8-W67C

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-15 06:32 – Updated: 2026-08-19 09:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

ntfs: skip extent mft records in writeback to prevent deadlock

This patch fixes the ABBA deadlock between extent_lock and extent mrec_lock triggered by xfstests generic/113, that occurs since the commit 6994acf33bae ("ntfs: use base mft_no when looking up base inode for extent record").

Path A (inode writeback): VFS writeback -> ntfs_write_inode() -> __ntfs_write_inode() -> mutex_lock(&ni->extent_lock) -> mutex_lock(&tni->mrec_lock)

Path B (MFT folio writeback): VFS writeback of $MFT dirty folios -> ntfs_mft_writepages() -> ntfs_write_mft_block() -> ntfs_may_write_mft_record() -> holds one extent mrec_lock from a previous iteration -> tries to acquire another base inode extent_lock

By removing all extent_lock and extent mrec_lock acquisition from the MFT folio writeback path, the ABBA lock ordering is eliminated:

Path A: __ntfs_write_inode(): extent_lock -> mrec_lock Path B (removed): ntfs_write_mft_block(): mrec_lock -> extent_lock

Path B is always redundant for extent records because:

  1. mark_mft_record_dirty(ext_ni) does NOT dirty the MFT folio. It only sets NInoDirty(ext_ni) and marks the base VFS inode dirty via __mark_inode_dirty(I_DIRTY_DATASYNC), which triggers Path A. Therefore, normal extent modifications never create a situation where the MFT folio is dirty and Path B is not scheduled.

  2. The MFT folio only gets dirtied via ntfs_mft_mark_dirty() inside ntfs_mft_record_alloc(). But all identified callers in attrib.c (ntfs_attr_add, ntfs_attr_record_move_away, ntfs_attr_make_non_resident, ntfs_attr_record_resize) follow through with mark_mft_record_dirty(), which triggers Path A to write the complete record.

  3. ntfs_evict_big_inode() calls ntfs_commit_inode() before freeing extent inodes, ensuring all dirty extents are flushed via Path A before the base inode leaves the icache.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-72203"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-08-15T06:21:38Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nntfs: skip extent mft records in writeback to prevent deadlock\n\nThis patch fixes the ABBA deadlock between extent_lock and extent\nmrec_lock triggered by xfstests generic/113, that occurs since the commit\n6994acf33bae (\"ntfs: use base mft_no when looking up base inode for\n\t\textent record\").\n\nPath A (inode writeback):\n  VFS writeback\n    -\u003e ntfs_write_inode()\n      -\u003e __ntfs_write_inode()\n        -\u003e mutex_lock(\u0026ni-\u003eextent_lock)\n        -\u003e mutex_lock(\u0026tni-\u003emrec_lock)\n\nPath B (MFT folio writeback):\n  VFS writeback of $MFT dirty folios\n    -\u003e ntfs_mft_writepages()\n      -\u003e ntfs_write_mft_block()\n        -\u003e ntfs_may_write_mft_record()\n          -\u003e holds one extent mrec_lock from a previous iteration\n          -\u003e tries to acquire another base inode extent_lock\n\nBy removing all extent_lock and extent mrec_lock acquisition from the MFT\nfolio writeback path, the ABBA lock ordering is eliminated:\n\nPath A: __ntfs_write_inode(): extent_lock -\u003e mrec_lock\nPath B (removed): ntfs_write_mft_block(): mrec_lock -\u003e extent_lock\n\nPath B is always redundant for extent records because:\n\n1. mark_mft_record_dirty(ext_ni) does NOT dirty the MFT folio.\n   It only sets NInoDirty(ext_ni) and marks the base VFS inode dirty\n   via __mark_inode_dirty(I_DIRTY_DATASYNC), which triggers Path A.\n   Therefore, normal extent modifications never create a situation where\n   the MFT folio is dirty and Path B is not scheduled.\n\n2. The MFT folio only gets dirtied via ntfs_mft_mark_dirty() inside\n   ntfs_mft_record_alloc(). But all identified callers in attrib.c\n   (ntfs_attr_add, ntfs_attr_record_move_away,\n   ntfs_attr_make_non_resident, ntfs_attr_record_resize) follow through\n   with mark_mft_record_dirty(), which triggers Path A to write the\n   complete record.\n\n3. ntfs_evict_big_inode() calls ntfs_commit_inode() before freeing extent\n   inodes, ensuring all dirty extents are flushed via Path A before the\n   base inode leaves the icache.",
  "id": "GHSA-p3pr-3qq8-w67c",
  "modified": "2026-08-19T09:31:22Z",
  "published": "2026-08-15T06:32:15Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-72203"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/76bc14c7097ff678b2b5dbfd4fa33b46897d87ce"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7ffa8f3d30236e0ab897c30bdb01224ff1fe1c89"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f831ab09d521898bf1dd99bf5adfd630ea1428e3"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…