GHSA-P3WM-JPP9-FX43
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 02:45 – Updated: 2022-05-14 02:45
VLAI
Details
IBM DB2 9.1 before FP11, 9.5 before FP9, 9.7 before FP5, and 9.8 before FP4 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) via a crafted Distributed Relational Database Architecture (DRDA) request.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2012-0710"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-20"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2012-03-20T20:55:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "IBM DB2 9.1 before FP11, 9.5 before FP9, 9.7 before FP5, and 9.8 before FP4 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) via a crafted Distributed Relational Database Architecture (DRDA) request.",
"id": "GHSA-p3wm-jpp9-fx43",
"modified": "2022-05-14T02:45:32Z",
"published": "2022-05-14T02:45:32Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2012-0710"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/73494"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A15078"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1IC76781"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1IC76899"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1IC76901"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1IC76902"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21588090"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/78282"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
Loading…
Loading…