ghsa-p4h8-95wc-cxcp
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 06:39
Modified
2022-05-01 06:39
Details
Cisco CallManager 3.2 and earlier, 3.3 before 3.3(5)SR1, 4.0 before 4.0(2a)SR2c, and 4.1 before 4.1(3)SR2 allow remote attackers to (1) cause a denial of service (CPU and memory consumption) via a large number of open TCP connections to port 2000 and (2) cause a denial of service (fill the Windows Service Manager communication queue) via a large number of TCP connections to port 2001, 2002, or 7727.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2006-0368" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2006-01-22T20:03:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "Cisco CallManager 3.2 and earlier, 3.3 before 3.3(5)SR1, 4.0 before 4.0(2a)SR2c, and 4.1 before 4.1(3)SR2 allow remote attackers to (1) cause a denial of service (CPU and memory consumption) via a large number of open TCP connections to port 2000 and (2) cause a denial of service (fill the Windows Service Manager communication queue) via a large number of TCP connections to port 2001, 2002, or 7727.", "id": "GHSA-p4h8-95wc-cxcp", "modified": "2022-05-01T06:39:07Z", "published": "2022-05-01T06:39:07Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2006-0368" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/24180" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/18494" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://securityreason.com/securityalert/359" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1015503" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20060118-ccmdos.shtml" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.osvdb.org/22622" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.osvdb.org/22623" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/16295" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/0249" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.