GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-P55C-54P6-956P

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-11 21:31 – Updated: 2026-09-14 15:32
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

power: supply: rt9455: quiesce delayed work before teardown

The threaded IRQ handler can queue pwr_rdy_work, max_charging_time_work and batt_presence_work. pwr_rdy_work and batt_presence_work can also queue max_charging_time_work, while batt_presence_work can requeue itself.

rt9455_remove() cancels max_charging_time_work before batt_presence_work. The latter can therefore queue max_charging_time_work after it has already been cancelled:

rt9455_remove() workqueue cancel pwr_rdy_work cancel max_charging_time_work batt_presence_work queues max_charging_time_work cancel batt_presence_work return devres frees rt9455_info max_charging_time_work dereferences rt9455_info

The IRQ also remains registered until devres cleanup and can queue more work after any of the cancellation calls. If rt9455_hw_init() fails after the IRQ has been requested, probe returns without cancelling work that may already have been queued. A pending callback can then access rt9455_info after it has been freed.

Register rt9455_cancel_all_delayed_works() through devm_add_action_or_reset() right after devm_power_supply_register(). devres invokes the action in reverse registration order, after the managed IRQ has been freed and before rt9455_info is released, so the delayed works are drained in both rt9455_remove() and the probe error path. Cancel pwr_rdy_work and batt_presence_work before max_charging_time_work because both can queue the latter.

This issue was found by an in-house static analysis tool.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-89465"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-09-11T20:19:27Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\npower: supply: rt9455: quiesce delayed work before teardown\n\nThe threaded IRQ handler can queue pwr_rdy_work,\nmax_charging_time_work and batt_presence_work.  pwr_rdy_work and\nbatt_presence_work can also queue max_charging_time_work, while\nbatt_presence_work can requeue itself.\n\nrt9455_remove() cancels max_charging_time_work before\nbatt_presence_work.  The latter can therefore queue\nmax_charging_time_work after it has already been cancelled:\n\n  rt9455_remove()                   workqueue\n    cancel pwr_rdy_work\n    cancel max_charging_time_work\n                                      batt_presence_work queues\n                                        max_charging_time_work\n    cancel batt_presence_work\n    return\n    devres frees rt9455_info\n                                      max_charging_time_work dereferences\n                                        rt9455_info\n\nThe IRQ also remains registered until devres cleanup and can queue more\nwork after any of the cancellation calls.  If rt9455_hw_init() fails\nafter the IRQ has been requested, probe returns without cancelling work\nthat may already have been queued.  A pending callback can then access\nrt9455_info after it has been freed.\n\nRegister rt9455_cancel_all_delayed_works() through\ndevm_add_action_or_reset() right after devm_power_supply_register().\ndevres invokes the action in reverse registration order, after the\nmanaged IRQ has been freed and before rt9455_info is released, so the\ndelayed works are drained in both rt9455_remove() and the probe error\npath.  Cancel pwr_rdy_work and batt_presence_work before\nmax_charging_time_work because both can queue the latter.\n\nThis issue was found by an in-house static analysis tool.",
  "id": "GHSA-p55c-54p6-956p",
  "modified": "2026-09-14T15:32:24Z",
  "published": "2026-09-11T21:31:27Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-89465"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1b9978433c61a9b46e48832a1ebceee1cf5c9eb4"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3e7a1ebc32fad5a558254a478efd401c17a24381"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/442c60c08ec23ac45da0a58877cab05e0a58f4ea"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7323e562f6961e4b7bce3225cde4ecbc78260deb"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/df67c7a2fff8414aa766b8cd5ffe11ec1ca27d02"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…