GHSA-P579-25JC-WXR5
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-03-27 18:31 – Updated: 2025-04-15 15:30
VLAI?
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mm: memcg: fix NULL pointer in mem_cgroup_track_foreign_dirty_slowpath()
As commit 18365225f044 ("hwpoison, memcg: forcibly uncharge LRU pages"), hwpoison will forcibly uncharg a LRU hwpoisoned page, the folio_memcg could be NULl, then, mem_cgroup_track_foreign_dirty_slowpath() could occurs a NULL pointer dereference, let's do not record the foreign writebacks for folio memcg is null in mem_cgroup_track_foreign_dirty() to fix it.
Severity ?
5.5 (Medium)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-52939"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-476"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-03-27T17:15:43Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmm: memcg: fix NULL pointer in mem_cgroup_track_foreign_dirty_slowpath()\n\nAs commit 18365225f044 (\"hwpoison, memcg: forcibly uncharge LRU pages\"),\nhwpoison will forcibly uncharg a LRU hwpoisoned page, the folio_memcg\ncould be NULl, then, mem_cgroup_track_foreign_dirty_slowpath() could\noccurs a NULL pointer dereference, let\u0027s do not record the foreign\nwritebacks for folio memcg is null in mem_cgroup_track_foreign_dirty() to\nfix it.",
"id": "GHSA-p579-25jc-wxr5",
"modified": "2025-04-15T15:30:46Z",
"published": "2025-03-27T18:31:25Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52939"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ac86f547ca1002aec2ef66b9e64d03f45bbbfbb9"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b79ba5953f6fdc5559389ad415620bffc24f024b"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…