GHSA-P5VF-5754-X7P3

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-02-13 21:02 – Updated: 2026-02-13 21:02
VLAI?
Summary
`polymarket-client-sdks` was removed from crates.io for malicious code
Details

It appeared to be typosquatting existing crate polymarket-client-sdk (sdks vs sdk) and attempting to steal credentials from local files.

The malicious crate had 1 version published on 2026-02-09 and had been downloaded only 33 times. There were no crates depending on this crate on crates.io.

Thanks to Roland Peelen for finding and reporting this to the crates.io team!

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "crates.io",
        "name": "polymarket-client-sdks"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-506"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-02-13T21:02:38Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "It appeared to be typosquatting existing crate [`polymarket-client-sdk`](https://crates.io/crates/polymarket-client-sdk) (`sdks` vs `sdk`) and attempting to steal credentials from local files.\n\nThe malicious crate had 1 version published on 2026-02-09 and had been downloaded only 33 times. There were no crates depending on this crate on crates.io.\n\nThanks to Roland Peelen for finding and reporting this to the crates.io team!",
  "id": "GHSA-p5vf-5754-x7p3",
  "modified": "2026-02-13T21:02:38Z",
  "published": "2026-02-13T21:02:38Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0011.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [],
  "summary": "`polymarket-client-sdks` was removed from crates.io for malicious code"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…