GHSA-P5VF-5754-X7P3
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-02-13 21:02 – Updated: 2026-02-13 21:02
VLAI?
Summary
`polymarket-client-sdks` was removed from crates.io for malicious code
Details
It appeared to be typosquatting existing crate polymarket-client-sdk (sdks vs sdk) and attempting to steal credentials from local files.
The malicious crate had 1 version published on 2026-02-09 and had been downloaded only 33 times. There were no crates depending on this crate on crates.io.
Thanks to Roland Peelen for finding and reporting this to the crates.io team!
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "crates.io",
"name": "polymarket-client-sdks"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-506"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-02-13T21:02:38Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "It appeared to be typosquatting existing crate [`polymarket-client-sdk`](https://crates.io/crates/polymarket-client-sdk) (`sdks` vs `sdk`) and attempting to steal credentials from local files.\n\nThe malicious crate had 1 version published on 2026-02-09 and had been downloaded only 33 times. There were no crates depending on this crate on crates.io.\n\nThanks to Roland Peelen for finding and reporting this to the crates.io team!",
"id": "GHSA-p5vf-5754-x7p3",
"modified": "2026-02-13T21:02:38Z",
"published": "2026-02-13T21:02:38Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0011.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [],
"summary": "`polymarket-client-sdks` was removed from crates.io for malicious code"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…