ghsa-p5xp-6vpf-jwvh
Vulnerability from github
Published
2019-09-23 18:32
Modified
2021-10-29 22:01
Severity ?
Summary
Improper Input Validation and Cross-Site Request Forgery in Keycloak
Details
It was found that Keycloak's account console, up to 6.0.1, did not perform adequate header checks in some requests. An attacker could use this flaw to trick an authenticated user into performing operations via request from an untrusted domain.
{ affected: [ { database_specific: { last_known_affected_version_range: "<= 6.0.1", }, package: { ecosystem: "Maven", name: "org.keycloak:keycloak-core", }, ranges: [ { events: [ { introduced: "0", }, { fixed: "7.0.0", }, ], type: "ECOSYSTEM", }, ], }, ], aliases: [ "CVE-2019-10199", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-20", "CWE-352", ], github_reviewed: true, github_reviewed_at: "2019-09-19T15:25:55Z", nvd_published_at: "2019-08-14T17:15:00Z", severity: "HIGH", }, details: "It was found that Keycloak's account console, up to 6.0.1, did not perform adequate header checks in some requests. An attacker could use this flaw to trick an authenticated user into performing operations via request from an untrusted domain.", id: "GHSA-p5xp-6vpf-jwvh", modified: "2021-10-29T22:01:59Z", published: "2019-09-23T18:32:27Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-10199", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2019-10199", }, { type: "PACKAGE", url: "https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", type: "CVSS_V3", }, ], summary: "Improper Input Validation and Cross-Site Request Forgery in Keycloak", }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.