ghsa-p649-hp44-fr85
Vulnerability from github
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
xdp: Remove WARN() from __xdp_reg_mem_model()
syzkaller reports a warning in __xdp_reg_mem_model().
The warning occurs only if __mem_id_init_hash_table() returns an error. It returns the error in two cases:
- memory allocation fails;
- rhashtable_init() fails when some fields of rhashtable_params struct are not initialized properly.
The second case cannot happen since there is a static const rhashtable_params struct with valid fields. So, warning is only triggered when there is a problem with memory allocation.
Thus, there is no sense in using WARN() to handle this error and it can be safely removed.
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 5065 at net/core/xdp.c:299 __xdp_reg_mem_model+0x2d9/0x650 net/core/xdp.c:299
CPU: 0 PID: 5065 Comm: syz-executor883 Not tainted 6.8.0-syzkaller-05271-gf99c5f563c17 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 03/27/2024 RIP: 0010:__xdp_reg_mem_model+0x2d9/0x650 net/core/xdp.c:299
Call Trace: xdp_reg_mem_model+0x22/0x40 net/core/xdp.c:344 xdp_test_run_setup net/bpf/test_run.c:188 [inline] bpf_test_run_xdp_live+0x365/0x1e90 net/bpf/test_run.c:377 bpf_prog_test_run_xdp+0x813/0x11b0 net/bpf/test_run.c:1267 bpf_prog_test_run+0x33a/0x3b0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4240 __sys_bpf+0x48d/0x810 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5649 __do_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5738 [inline] __se_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5736 [inline] __x64_sys_bpf+0x7c/0x90 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5736 do_syscall_64+0xfb/0x240 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with syzkaller.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-42082"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-770"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-07-29T16:15:07Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nxdp: Remove WARN() from __xdp_reg_mem_model()\n\nsyzkaller reports a warning in __xdp_reg_mem_model().\n\nThe warning occurs only if __mem_id_init_hash_table() returns an error. It\nreturns the error in two cases:\n\n 1. memory allocation fails;\n 2. rhashtable_init() fails when some fields of rhashtable_params\n struct are not initialized properly.\n\nThe second case cannot happen since there is a static const rhashtable_params\nstruct with valid fields. So, warning is only triggered when there is a\nproblem with memory allocation.\n\nThus, there is no sense in using WARN() to handle this error and it can be\nsafely removed.\n\nWARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 5065 at net/core/xdp.c:299 __xdp_reg_mem_model+0x2d9/0x650 net/core/xdp.c:299\n\nCPU: 0 PID: 5065 Comm: syz-executor883 Not tainted 6.8.0-syzkaller-05271-gf99c5f563c17 #0\nHardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 03/27/2024\nRIP: 0010:__xdp_reg_mem_model+0x2d9/0x650 net/core/xdp.c:299\n\nCall Trace:\n xdp_reg_mem_model+0x22/0x40 net/core/xdp.c:344\n xdp_test_run_setup net/bpf/test_run.c:188 [inline]\n bpf_test_run_xdp_live+0x365/0x1e90 net/bpf/test_run.c:377\n bpf_prog_test_run_xdp+0x813/0x11b0 net/bpf/test_run.c:1267\n bpf_prog_test_run+0x33a/0x3b0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4240\n __sys_bpf+0x48d/0x810 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5649\n __do_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5738 [inline]\n __se_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5736 [inline]\n __x64_sys_bpf+0x7c/0x90 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5736\n do_syscall_64+0xfb/0x240\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75\n\nFound by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with syzkaller.",
"id": "GHSA-p649-hp44-fr85",
"modified": "2024-07-30T21:31:26Z",
"published": "2024-07-29T18:30:40Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42082"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1095b8efbb13a6a5fa583ed373ee1ccab29da2d0"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/14e51ea78b4ccacb7acb1346b9241bb790a2054c"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1d3e3b3aa2cbe9bc7db9a7f8673a9fa6d2990d54"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4e0c539ee265d5c6e7fa7d229cd4aa7bc01816e2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7e9f79428372c6eab92271390851be34ab26bfb4"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f92298b0467fd77edc4c1a2c3e48833e69840ec4"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.