ghsa-p6w5-mv25-26mv
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:04
Modified
2022-05-13 01:04
Severity ?
Details
A flaw was found in glusterfs server through versions 4.1.4 and 3.1.2 which allowed repeated usage of GF_META_LOCK_KEY xattr. A remote, authenticated attacker could use this flaw to create multiple locks for single inode by using setxattr repetitively resulting in memory exhaustion of glusterfs server node.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2018-14660" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-400", "CWE-770" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2018-11-01T14:29:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "A flaw was found in glusterfs server through versions 4.1.4 and 3.1.2 which allowed repeated usage of GF_META_LOCK_KEY xattr. A remote, authenticated attacker could use this flaw to create multiple locks for single inode by using setxattr repetitively resulting in memory exhaustion of glusterfs server node.", "id": "GHSA-p6w5-mv25-26mv", "modified": "2022-05-13T01:04:43Z", "published": "2022-05-13T01:04:43Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-14660" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3431" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3432" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3470" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-14660" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1635926" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2018-14660" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/11/msg00000.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201904-06" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.