GHSA-P77Q-96CJ-C83Q
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 01:04 – Updated: 2025-04-11 03:37
VLAI?
Details
Integer overflow in an array class in Mozilla Firefox 3.5.x before 3.5.11 and 3.6.x before 3.6.7, Thunderbird 3.0.x before 3.0.6 and 3.1.x before 3.1.1, and SeaMonkey before 2.0.6 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by placing many Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) values in an array, related to references to external font resources and an inconsistency between 16-bit and 32-bit integers.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2010-2752"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2010-07-30T20:30:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Integer overflow in an array class in Mozilla Firefox 3.5.x before 3.5.11 and 3.6.x before 3.6.7, Thunderbird 3.0.x before 3.0.6 and 3.1.x before 3.1.1, and SeaMonkey before 2.0.6 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by placing many Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) values in an array, related to references to external font resources and an inconsistency between 16-bit and 32-bit integers.",
"id": "GHSA-p77q-96cj-c83q",
"modified": "2025-04-11T03:37:50Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T01:04:52Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2010-2752"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=574059"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A11680"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.mozilla.org/security/announce/2010/mfsa2010-39.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/512514"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/41852"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-10-133"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…