ghsa-p77q-96cj-c83q
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 01:04
Modified
2022-05-17 01:04
Details
Integer overflow in an array class in Mozilla Firefox 3.5.x before 3.5.11 and 3.6.x before 3.6.7, Thunderbird 3.0.x before 3.0.6 and 3.1.x before 3.1.1, and SeaMonkey before 2.0.6 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by placing many Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) values in an array, related to references to external font resources and an inconsistency between 16-bit and 32-bit integers.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2010-2752" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2010-07-30T20:30:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "Integer overflow in an array class in Mozilla Firefox 3.5.x before 3.5.11 and 3.6.x before 3.6.7, Thunderbird 3.0.x before 3.0.6 and 3.1.x before 3.1.1, and SeaMonkey before 2.0.6 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by placing many Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) values in an array, related to references to external font resources and an inconsistency between 16-bit and 32-bit integers.", "id": "GHSA-p77q-96cj-c83q", "modified": "2022-05-17T01:04:52Z", "published": "2022-05-17T01:04:52Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2010-2752" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=574059" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A11680" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.mozilla.org/security/announce/2010/mfsa2010-39.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/512514" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/41852" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-10-133" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.