GHSA-P797-QV57-J9X8
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-01-13 18:31 – Updated: 2026-01-13 18:31In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ublk: clean up user copy references on ublk server exit
If a ublk server process releases a ublk char device file, any requests dispatched to the ublk server but not yet completed will retain a ref value of UBLK_REFCOUNT_INIT. Before commit e63d2228ef83 ("ublk: simplify aborting ublk request"), __ublk_fail_req() would decrement the reference count before completing the failed request. However, that commit optimized __ublk_fail_req() to call __ublk_complete_rq() directly without decrementing the request reference count. The leaked reference count incorrectly allows user copy and zero copy operations on the completed ublk request. It also triggers the WARN_ON_ONCE(refcount_read(&io->ref)) warnings in ublk_queue_reinit() and ublk_deinit_queue(). Commit c5c5eb24ed61 ("ublk: avoid ublk_io_release() called after ublk char dev is closed") already fixed the issue for ublk devices using UBLK_F_SUPPORT_ZERO_COPY or UBLK_F_AUTO_BUF_REG. However, the reference count leak also affects UBLK_F_USER_COPY, the other reference-counted data copy mode. Fix the condition in ublk_check_and_reset_active_ref() to include all reference-counted data copy modes. This ensures that any ublk requests still owned by the ublk server when it exits have their reference counts reset to 0.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-71070"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-01-13T16:16:06Z",
"severity": null
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nublk: clean up user copy references on ublk server exit\n\nIf a ublk server process releases a ublk char device file, any requests\ndispatched to the ublk server but not yet completed will retain a ref\nvalue of UBLK_REFCOUNT_INIT. Before commit e63d2228ef83 (\"ublk: simplify\naborting ublk request\"), __ublk_fail_req() would decrement the reference\ncount before completing the failed request. However, that commit\noptimized __ublk_fail_req() to call __ublk_complete_rq() directly\nwithout decrementing the request reference count.\nThe leaked reference count incorrectly allows user copy and zero copy\noperations on the completed ublk request. It also triggers the\nWARN_ON_ONCE(refcount_read(\u0026io-\u003eref)) warnings in ublk_queue_reinit()\nand ublk_deinit_queue().\nCommit c5c5eb24ed61 (\"ublk: avoid ublk_io_release() called after ublk\nchar dev is closed\") already fixed the issue for ublk devices using\nUBLK_F_SUPPORT_ZERO_COPY or UBLK_F_AUTO_BUF_REG. However, the reference\ncount leak also affects UBLK_F_USER_COPY, the other reference-counted\ndata copy mode. Fix the condition in ublk_check_and_reset_active_ref()\nto include all reference-counted data copy modes. This ensures that any\nublk requests still owned by the ublk server when it exits have their\nreference counts reset to 0.",
"id": "GHSA-p797-qv57-j9x8",
"modified": "2026-01-13T18:31:05Z",
"published": "2026-01-13T18:31:05Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-71070"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/13456b4f1033d911f8bf3a0a1195656f293ba0f6"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/daa24603d9f0808929514ee62ced30052ca7221c"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.