GHSA-P7MX-J9J5-HV76
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 02:37 – Updated: 2022-05-14 02:37
VLAI?
Details
Multiple buffer overflows in Rumpus before 6.0.1 allow remote attackers to (1) cause a denial of service (segmentation fault) via a long HTTP verb in the HTTP component; and allow remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code via a long argument to the (2) MKD, (3) XMKD, (4) RMD, and other unspecified commands in the FTP component.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2008-7078"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-119"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2009-08-25T10:30:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Multiple buffer overflows in Rumpus before 6.0.1 allow remote attackers to (1) cause a denial of service (segmentation fault) via a long HTTP verb in the HTTP component; and allow remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code via a long argument to the (2) MKD, (3) XMKD, (4) RMD, and other unspecified commands in the FTP component.",
"id": "GHSA-p7mx-j9j5-hv76",
"modified": "2022-05-14T02:37:55Z",
"published": "2022-05-14T02:37:55Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2008-7078"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/46987"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/46988"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/7314"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/fulldisclosure/2008-12/0007.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/32892"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.maxum.com/Rumpus/News601.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/498786/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/32558"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/32560"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…