ghsa-p847-p2jr-v5qq
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 03:25
Modified
2022-05-17 03:25
Details
rx/rx.c in OpenAFS before 1.6.15 and 1.7.x before 1.7.33 does not properly initialize the padding of a data structure when constructing an Rx acknowledgement (ACK) packet, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information by (1) conducting a replay attack or (2) sniffing the network.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2015-7762" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-200" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2015-11-06T21:59:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "rx/rx.c in OpenAFS before 1.6.15 and 1.7.x before 1.7.33 does not properly initialize the padding of a data structure when constructing an Rx acknowledgement (ACK) packet, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information by (1) conducting a replay attack or (2) sniffing the network.", "id": "GHSA-p847-p2jr-v5qq", "modified": "2022-05-17T03:25:31Z", "published": "2022-05-17T03:25:31Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-7762" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.openafs.org/pipermail/openafs-announce/2015/000493.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.openafs.org/dl/openafs/1.6.15/RELNOTES-1.6.15" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.openafs.org/pages/security/OPENAFS-SA-2015-007.txt" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2015/dsa-3387" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1034039" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.