ghsa-p8q8-xqgv-rwvr
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:37
Modified
2022-05-13 01:37
Severity ?
Details
A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability was found in NBD server implementation in qemu before 2.11 allowing a client to request an export name of size up to 4096 bytes, which in fact should be limited to 256 bytes, causing an out-of-bounds stack write in the qemu process. If NBD server requires TLS, the attacker cannot trigger the buffer overflow without first successfully negotiating TLS.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2017-15118" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-787" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2018-07-27T21:29:00Z", "severity": "CRITICAL" }, "details": "A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability was found in NBD server implementation in qemu before 2.11 allowing a client to request an export name of size up to 4096 bytes, which in fact should be limited to 256 bytes, causing an out-of-bounds stack write in the qemu process. If NBD server requires TLS, the attacker cannot trigger the buffer overflow without first successfully negotiating TLS.", "id": "GHSA-p8q8-xqgv-rwvr", "modified": "2022-05-13T01:37:33Z", "published": "2022-05-13T01:37:33Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-15118" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1104" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2017-15118" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2017-11/msg05045.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://usn.ubuntu.com/3575-1" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/43194" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2017/11/28/8" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/101975" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.