GHSA-P9J6-5F4R-FCWC
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-04-29 02:58 – Updated: 2025-04-03 04:06
VLAI?
Details
The argument parser of the FETCH command in Cyrus IMAP Server 2.2.x through 2.2.8 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code via certain commands such as (1) "body[p", (2) "binary[p", or (3) "binary[p") that cause an index increment error that leads to an out-of-bounds memory corruption.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2004-1013"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2005-01-10T05:00:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "The argument parser of the FETCH command in Cyrus IMAP Server 2.2.x through 2.2.8 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code via certain commands such as (1) \"body[p\", (2) \"binary[p\", or (3) \"binary[p\") that cause an index increment error that leads to an out-of-bounds memory corruption.",
"id": "GHSA-p9j6-5f4r-fcwc",
"modified": "2025-04-03T04:06:50Z",
"published": "2022-04-29T02:58:47Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2004-1013"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.ubuntu.com/usn/usn-31-1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://asg.web.cmu.edu/archive/message.php?mailbox=archive.cyrus-announce\u0026msg=143"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/download/imapd/changes.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=110123023521619\u0026w=2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/13274"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://security.e-matters.de/advisories/152004.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-200411-34.xml"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2004/dsa-597"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDKSA-2004:139"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…