GHSA-PC49-G522-PMH5

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-12-25 09:30 – Updated: 2024-01-03 21:30
VLAI?
Details

An issue was discovered in SESAMI planfocus CPTO (Cash Point & Transport Optimizer) 6.3.8.6 718. There is XSS via the Name field when modifying a client.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2023-31297"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-79"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2023-12-25T07:15:08Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "An issue was discovered in SESAMI planfocus CPTO (Cash Point \u0026 Transport Optimizer) 6.3.8.6 718. There is XSS via the Name field when modifying a client.",
  "id": "GHSA-pc49-g522-pmh5",
  "modified": "2024-01-03T21:30:31Z",
  "published": "2023-12-25T09:30:19Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-31297"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://herolab.usd.de/en/security-advisories/usd-2022-0058"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://herolab.usd.de/security-advisories"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…