GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-PF3V-QRVC-CHW5

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-28 09:31 – Updated: 2026-08-29 09:30
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

ocfs2: fix out-of-bounds write in ocfs2_remove_refcount_extent

[BUG] Unlinking a refcounted file whose refcount tree has leaf blocks triggers a fortify panic due to an out-of-bounds write.

[CAUSE] When the last leaf block is removed from a refcount tree, ocfs2_remove_refcount_extent() converts the root back to leaf mode with a bulk memset on &rb->rf_records. rf_records sits in an anonymous union with rf_list. rf_list.l_tree_depth aliases rf_records.rl_count, and is 0 for a single-level tree. With rl_count equal to 0, the memset writes past the 16-byte declared size of rf_records, which the fortify checker catches.

[FIX] Replace the bulk memset on &rb->rf_records with a correctly-bounded memset on rl_recs[] alone, after setting rl_count to the correct value.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-80638"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-08-28T08:16:48Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nocfs2: fix out-of-bounds write in ocfs2_remove_refcount_extent\n\n[BUG]\nUnlinking a refcounted file whose refcount tree has leaf blocks\ntriggers a fortify panic due to an out-of-bounds write.\n\n[CAUSE]\nWhen the last leaf block is removed from a refcount tree,\nocfs2_remove_refcount_extent() converts the root back to leaf mode\nwith a bulk memset on \u0026rb-\u003erf_records. rf_records sits in an anonymous\nunion with rf_list. rf_list.l_tree_depth aliases rf_records.rl_count,\nand is 0 for a single-level tree. With rl_count equal to 0, the memset\nwrites past the 16-byte declared size of rf_records, which the fortify\nchecker catches.\n\n[FIX]\nReplace the bulk memset on \u0026rb-\u003erf_records with a correctly-bounded\nmemset on rl_recs[] alone, after setting rl_count to the correct value.",
  "id": "GHSA-pf3v-qrvc-chw5",
  "modified": "2026-08-29T09:30:26Z",
  "published": "2026-08-28T09:31:47Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-80638"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1ec3cca2d8b6b9ff6584ca626d4c8918bbf48d44"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f5255516ec7add3a6d5d37853ad5a9a9ddb14305"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…