GHSA-PFFQ-9WR4-6HJX

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-24 18:32 – Updated: 2026-06-24 18:32
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net: ena: PHC: Fix potential use-after-free in get_timestamp

Move the phc->active check and resp pointer assignment to after acquiring the spinlock. Previously, phc->active was checked without holding the lock, and resp was cached from ena_dev->phc.virt_addr before the lock was acquired.

If ena_com_phc_destroy() runs between the lockless active check and the lock acquisition, it sets active=false, releases the lock, frees the DMA memory, and sets virt_addr=NULL. The get_timestamp path would then read a NULL virt_addr and dereference it.

With both the active check and the pointer read under the lock, destroy cannot free the memory while get_timestamp is using it.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-52971"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-06-24T17:17:07Z",
    "severity": null
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet: ena: PHC: Fix potential use-after-free in get_timestamp\n\nMove the phc-\u003eactive check and resp pointer assignment to after\nacquiring the spinlock. Previously, phc-\u003eactive was checked without\nholding the lock, and resp was cached from ena_dev-\u003ephc.virt_addr\nbefore the lock was acquired.\n\nIf ena_com_phc_destroy() runs between the lockless active check and\nthe lock acquisition, it sets active=false, releases the lock, frees\nthe DMA memory, and sets virt_addr=NULL. The get_timestamp path would\nthen read a NULL virt_addr and dereference it.\n\nWith both the active check and the pointer read under the lock,\ndestroy cannot free the memory while get_timestamp is using it.",
  "id": "GHSA-pffq-9wr4-6hjx",
  "modified": "2026-06-24T18:32:42Z",
  "published": "2026-06-24T18:32:42Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-52971"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/95e8ae9af2a61b4e72f5c585bf4c7d8aaf2a2c98"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ca9ed40f28949353911dcb524ff8fff2f3409c97"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e42c755582f0960e684298762f0ab927b3778376"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…