GHSA-PFQQ-QPV2-V6Q9
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-02 03:48 – Updated: 2022-05-02 03:48
VLAI
Details
Heap-based buffer overflow in FormMax (formerly AcroForm) evaluation 3.5 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service or possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted FormMax import (.aim) file. NOTE: the provenance of this information is unknown; the details are obtained solely from third party information.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2009-3790"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-119"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2009-10-26T17:30:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Heap-based buffer overflow in FormMax (formerly AcroForm) evaluation 3.5 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service or possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted FormMax import (.aim) file. NOTE: the provenance of this information is unknown; the details are obtained solely from third party information.",
"id": "GHSA-pfqq-qpv2-v6q9",
"modified": "2022-05-02T03:48:32Z",
"published": "2022-05-02T03:48:32Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2009-3790"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/53890"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://osvdb.org/59079"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/36943"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
Loading…
Loading…