ghsa-pg34-hwv9-r5fx
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 04:16
Modified
2022-05-17 04:16
Details

Siemens Ruggedcom WIN51xx devices with firmware before SS4.4.4624.35, WIN52xx devices with firmware before SS4.4.4624.35, WIN70xx devices with firmware before BS4.4.4621.32, and WIN72xx devices with firmware before BS4.4.4621.32 allow context-dependent attackers to discover password hashes by reading (1) files or (2) security logs.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2015-1357"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-200"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2015-02-02T15:59:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Siemens Ruggedcom WIN51xx devices with firmware before SS4.4.4624.35, WIN52xx devices with firmware before SS4.4.4624.35, WIN70xx devices with firmware before BS4.4.4621.32, and WIN72xx devices with firmware before BS4.4.4621.32 allow context-dependent attackers to discover password hashes by reading (1) files or (2) security logs.",
  "id": "GHSA-pg34-hwv9-r5fx",
  "modified": "2022-05-17T04:16:35Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T04:16:35Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-1357"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.siemens.com/innovation/pool/de/forschungsfelder/siemens_security_advisory_ssa-753139.pdf"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.