ghsa-pg7h-v386-fw8h
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-24 17:22
Modified
2022-05-24 17:22
Severity ?
Details
libldap in certain third-party OpenLDAP packages has a certificate-validation flaw when the third-party package is asserting RFC6125 support. It considers CN even when there is a non-matching subjectAltName (SAN). This is fixed in, for example, openldap-2.4.46-10.el8 in Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2020-15719" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-295" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2020-07-14T14:15:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "libldap in certain third-party OpenLDAP packages has a certificate-validation flaw when the third-party package is asserting RFC6125 support. It considers CN even when there is a non-matching subjectAltName (SAN). This is fixed in, for example, openldap-2.4.46-10.el8 in Red Hat Enterprise Linux.", "id": "GHSA-pg7h-v386-fw8h", "modified": "2022-05-24T17:22:52Z", "published": "2022-05-24T17:22:52Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-15719" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:3674" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9266" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1740070" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content\u0026id=SB10365" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-09/msg00033.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-09/msg00059.html" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.