ghsa-pgm5-2qgh-cvjr
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 23:34
Modified
2022-05-01 23:34
Details
Stack-based buffer overflow in the DoLBURPRequest function in libnldap in ndsd in Novell eDirectory 8.7.3.9 and earlier, and 8.8.1 and earlier in the 8.8.x series, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash or CPU consumption) or execute arbitrary code via a long delRequest LDAP Extended Request message, probably involving a long Distinguished Name (DN) field.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2008-0924", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-119", ], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2008-03-28T18:44:00Z", severity: "MODERATE", }, details: "Stack-based buffer overflow in the DoLBURPRequest function in libnldap in ndsd in Novell eDirectory 8.7.3.9 and earlier, and 8.8.1 and earlier in the 8.8.x series, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash or CPU consumption) or execute arbitrary code via a long delRequest LDAP Extended Request message, probably involving a long Distinguished Name (DN) field.", id: "GHSA-pgm5-2qgh-cvjr", modified: "2022-05-01T23:34:48Z", published: "2022-05-01T23:34:48Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2008-0924", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://secure-support.novell.com/KanisaPlatform/Publishing/411/3382120_f.SAL_Public.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/29476", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/490117/100/0/threaded", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/28434", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1019692", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2008/0987/references", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-08-013", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.