ghsa-phfq-h2c2-v87m
Vulnerability from github
Published
2024-02-08 06:30
Modified
2024-02-08 06:30
Severity ?
Details
The Royal Elementor Addons and Templates plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.3.87. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the wpr_update_form_action_meta function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to post metadata via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2024-0511" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-352" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2024-02-08T06:15:51Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "The Royal Elementor Addons and Templates plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.3.87. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the wpr_update_form_action_meta function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to post metadata via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.", "id": "GHSA-phfq-h2c2-v87m", "modified": "2024-02-08T06:30:24Z", "published": "2024-02-08T06:30:24Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-0511" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset?sfp_email=\u0026sfph_mail=\u0026reponame=\u0026old=3026824%40royal-elementor-addons%2Ftags%2F1.3.87\u0026new=3032004%40royal-elementor-addons%2Ftags%2F1.3.88" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/dc8bef03-51e0-4448-bddd-85300104e875?source=cve" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.