GHSA-PHG6-J5PG-W4C8
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 01:53 – Updated: 2022-05-17 01:53
VLAI?
Details
Buffer overflow in the UnitelWay Windows Device Driver, as used in Schneider Electric Unity Pro 6 and earlier, OPC Factory Server 3.34, Vijeo Citect 7.20 and earlier, Telemecanique Driver Pack 2.6 and earlier, Monitor Pro 7.6 and earlier, and PL7 Pro 4.5 and earlier, allows local users, and possibly remote attackers, to execute arbitrary code via an unspecified system parameter.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2011-3330"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-119"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2011-11-04T21:55:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Buffer overflow in the UnitelWay Windows Device Driver, as used in Schneider Electric Unity Pro 6 and earlier, OPC Factory Server 3.34, Vijeo Citect 7.20 and earlier, Telemecanique Driver Pack 2.6 and earlier, Monitor Pro 7.6 and earlier, and PL7 Pro 4.5 and earlier, allows local users, and possibly remote attackers, to execute arbitrary code via an unspecified system parameter.",
"id": "GHSA-phg6-j5pg-w4c8",
"modified": "2022-05-17T01:53:42Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T01:53:42Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2011-3330"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/70882"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/46534"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.scada.schneider-electric.com/sites/scada/en/login/vijeo-citect-unitelway-windows-device-driver.page"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/50319"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1026234"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.us-cert.gov/control_systems/pdf/ICSA-11-277-01.pdf"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…