ghsa-phxm-4gpx-94fr
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:28
Modified
2022-05-13 01:28
Details
The kdc_handle_protected_negotiation function in the Key Distribution Center (KDC) in MIT Kerberos 5 (aka krb5) 1.8.x, 1.9.x before 1.9.5, and 1.10.x before 1.10.3 attempts to calculate a checksum before verifying that the key type is appropriate for a checksum, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (uninitialized pointer free, heap memory corruption, and daemon crash) via a crafted AS-REQ request.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2012-1015", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-20", ], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2012-08-06T16:55:00Z", severity: "HIGH", }, details: "The kdc_handle_protected_negotiation function in the Key Distribution Center (KDC) in MIT Kerberos 5 (aka krb5) 1.8.x, 1.9.x before 1.9.5, and 1.10.x before 1.10.3 attempts to calculate a checksum before verifying that the key type is appropriate for a checksum, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (uninitialized pointer free, heap memory corruption, and daemon crash) via a crafted AS-REQ request.", id: "GHSA-phxm-4gpx-94fr", modified: "2022-05-13T01:28:51Z", published: "2022-05-13T01:28:51Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2012-1015", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2012-08/msg00016.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-1131.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://web.mit.edu/kerberos/advisories/MITKRB5-SA-2012-001.txt", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.debian.org/security/2012/dsa-2518", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2012:120", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.