ghsa-pj7f-5c59-qj9r
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-04-29 02:58
Modified
2022-04-29 02:58
Details

The smb_recv_trans2 function call in the samba filesystem (smbfs) in Linux kernel 2.4 and 2.6 does not properly handle the re-assembly of fragmented packets correctly, which could allow remote samba servers to (1) read arbitrary kernel information or (2) raise a counter value to an arbitrary number by sending the first part of the fragmented packet multiple times.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2004-0949"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2005-01-10T05:00:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "The smb_recv_trans2 function call in the samba filesystem (smbfs) in Linux kernel 2.4 and 2.6 does not properly handle the re-assembly of fragmented packets correctly, which could allow remote samba servers to (1) read arbitrary kernel information or (2) raise a counter value to an arbitrary number by sending the first part of the fragmented packet multiple times.",
  "id": "GHSA-pj7f-5c59-qj9r",
  "modified": "2022-04-29T02:58:41Z",
  "published": "2022-04-29T02:58:40Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2004-0949"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2336"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/18137"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A10360"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.ubuntu.com/usn/usn-30-1"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=110072140811965\u0026w=2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/13232"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/20162"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/20163"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/20202"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/20338"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://security.e-matters.de/advisories/142004.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2006/dsa-1067"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2006/dsa-1069"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2006/dsa-1070"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2006/dsa-1082"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDKSA-2005:022"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2004-504.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2004-505.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2004-537.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/11695"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.trustix.org/errata/2004/0061"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.