GHSA-PJX7-Q3C9-2QPG

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 18:32 – Updated: 2022-05-01 18:32
VLAI?
Details

The RepliStor Server Service in EMC Replistor 6.1.3 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a size value that causes RepliStor to create a smaller buffer than expected, which triggers a buffer overflow when that buffer is used in a recv function call.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2007-5323"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-119"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2007-10-11T00:17:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "The RepliStor Server Service in EMC Replistor 6.1.3 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a size value that causes RepliStor to create a smaller buffer than expected, which triggers a buffer overflow when that buffer is used in a recv function call.",
  "id": "GHSA-pjx7-q3c9-2qpg",
  "modified": "2022-05-01T18:32:16Z",
  "published": "2022-05-01T18:32:16Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2007-5323"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/37075"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://dvlabs.tippingpoint.com/advisory/TPTI-07-18"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/27166"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/26014"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1018799"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/3458"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…