ghsa-pmmr-r9v2-59p8
Vulnerability from github
Published
2023-05-16 18:30
Modified
2023-05-17 03:26
Severity ?
Summary
Jenkins Reverse Proxy Auth Plugin cross-site request forgery vulnerability
Details
Jenkins Reverse Proxy Auth Plugin 1.7.4 and earlier does not require POST requests for a form validation method, resulting in a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability.
This vulnerability allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified LDAP server using attacker-specified credentials.
Reverse Proxy Auth Plugin 1.7.5 requires POST requests for the affected form validation method.
{ "affected": [ { "package": { "ecosystem": "Maven", "name": "org.jenkins-ci.plugins:reverse-proxy-auth-plugin" }, "ranges": [ { "events": [ { "introduced": "0" }, { "fixed": "1.7.5" } ], "type": "ECOSYSTEM" } ] } ], "aliases": [ "CVE-2023-32987" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-352" ], "github_reviewed": true, "github_reviewed_at": "2023-05-17T03:26:11Z", "nvd_published_at": "2023-05-16T16:15:11Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "Jenkins Reverse Proxy Auth Plugin 1.7.4 and earlier does not require POST requests for a form validation method, resulting in a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability.\n\nThis vulnerability allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified LDAP server using attacker-specified credentials.\n\nReverse Proxy Auth Plugin 1.7.5 requires POST requests for the affected form validation method.", "id": "GHSA-pmmr-r9v2-59p8", "modified": "2023-05-17T03:26:11Z", "published": "2023-05-16T18:30:16Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-32987" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.jenkins.io/security/advisory/2023-05-16/#SECURITY-3002" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ], "summary": "Jenkins Reverse Proxy Auth Plugin cross-site request forgery vulnerability" }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.