GHSA-PP8C-QFHV-484P
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-05-20 18:30 – Updated: 2025-11-17 15:30
VLAI?
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ocfs2: fix panic in failed foilio allocation
commit 7e119cff9d0a ("ocfs2: convert w_pages to w_folios") and commit 9a5e08652dc4b ("ocfs2: use an array of folios instead of an array of pages") save -ENOMEM in the folio array upon allocation failure and call the folio array free code.
The folio array free code expects either valid folio pointers or NULL. Finding the -ENOMEM will result in a panic. Fix by NULLing the error folio entry.
Severity ?
5.5 (Medium)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-37950"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-476"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-05-20T16:15:33Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nocfs2: fix panic in failed foilio allocation\n\ncommit 7e119cff9d0a (\"ocfs2: convert w_pages to w_folios\") and commit\n9a5e08652dc4b (\"ocfs2: use an array of folios instead of an array of\npages\") save -ENOMEM in the folio array upon allocation failure and call\nthe folio array free code.\n\nThe folio array free code expects either valid folio pointers or NULL. \nFinding the -ENOMEM will result in a panic. Fix by NULLing the error\nfolio entry.",
"id": "GHSA-pp8c-qfhv-484p",
"modified": "2025-11-17T15:30:32Z",
"published": "2025-05-20T18:30:56Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-37950"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/31d4cd4eb2f8d9b87ebfa6a5e443a59e3b3d7b8c"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/80d18f060d5bdf2c5eb3d1d00dcb744d6a879222"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…