GHSA-PRPJ-QG9J-R8QG

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 02:20 – Updated: 2022-05-17 02:20
VLAI
Details

IBM i OSPF 6.1, 7.1, 7.2, and 7.3 is vulnerable when a rogue router spoofs its origin. Routing tables are affected by a missing LSA, which may lead to loss of connectivity. IBM X-Force ID: 128379.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2017-1460"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-20"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2017-07-31T21:29:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "IBM i OSPF 6.1, 7.1, 7.2, and 7.3 is vulnerable when a rogue router spoofs its origin. Routing tables are affected by a missing LSA, which may lead to loss of connectivity. IBM X-Force ID: 128379.",
  "id": "GHSA-prpj-qg9j-r8qg",
  "modified": "2022-05-17T02:20:33Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T02:20:33Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-1460"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/128379"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=nas8N1022191"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…