ghsa-pv44-4882-pr49
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 03:21
Modified
2022-05-17 03:21
Severity ?
Details
The DCM reader in ImageMagick before 6.9.4-5 and 7.x before 7.0.1-7 allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact by leveraging lack of validation of (1) pixel.red, (2) pixel.green, and (3) pixel.blue.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2016-5691" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-20" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2016-12-13T15:59:00Z", "severity": "CRITICAL" }, "details": "The DCM reader in ImageMagick before 6.9.4-5 and 7.x before 7.0.1-7 allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact by leveraging lack of validation of (1) pixel.red, (2) pixel.green, and (3) pixel.blue.", "id": "GHSA-pv44-4882-pr49", "modified": "2022-05-17T03:21:20Z", "published": "2022-05-17T03:21:20Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-5691" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/commit/5511ef530576ed18fd636baa3bb4eda3d667665d" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://blog.fuzzing-project.org/46-Various-invalid-memory-reads-in-ImageMagick-WPG,-DDS,-DCM.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/blob/6.9.4-5/ChangeLog" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/blob/7.0.1-7/ChangeLog" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/06/14/5" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/06/17/3" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/bulletinjul2016-3090568.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/91283" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.