GHSA-PW37-QHWF-P7XF
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-13 01:31 – Updated: 2025-04-20 03:39
VLAI?
Details
A buffer overflow in Smart Card authentication code in gpkcsp.dll in Microsoft Windows XP through SP3 and Server 2003 through SP2 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code on the target computer, provided that the computer is joined in a Windows domain and has Remote Desktop Protocol connectivity (or Terminal Services) enabled.
Severity ?
8.1 (High)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2017-0176"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-120"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2017-06-22T14:29:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "A buffer overflow in Smart Card authentication code in gpkcsp.dll in Microsoft Windows XP through SP3 and Server 2003 through SP2 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code on the target computer, provided that the computer is joined in a Windows domain and has Remote Desktop Protocol connectivity (or Terminal Services) enabled.",
"id": "GHSA-pw37-qhwf-p7xf",
"modified": "2025-04-20T03:39:27Z",
"published": "2022-05-13T01:31:02Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-0176"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://blog.0patch.com/2017/06/a-quick-analysis-of-microsofts.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://blog.fortinet.com/2017/05/11/deep-analysis-of-esteemaudit"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/msrc/2017/04/14/protecting-customers-and-evaluating-risk"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/4022747/security-update-for-windows-xp-and-windows-server-2003"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/98550"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/98752"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…