ghsa-pw37-qhwf-p7xf
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:31
Modified
2022-05-13 01:31
Severity ?
Details
A buffer overflow in Smart Card authentication code in gpkcsp.dll in Microsoft Windows XP through SP3 and Server 2003 through SP2 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code on the target computer, provided that the computer is joined in a Windows domain and has Remote Desktop Protocol connectivity (or Terminal Services) enabled.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2017-0176" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-120" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2017-06-22T14:29:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "A buffer overflow in Smart Card authentication code in gpkcsp.dll in Microsoft Windows XP through SP3 and Server 2003 through SP2 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code on the target computer, provided that the computer is joined in a Windows domain and has Remote Desktop Protocol connectivity (or Terminal Services) enabled.", "id": "GHSA-pw37-qhwf-p7xf", "modified": "2022-05-13T01:31:02Z", "published": "2022-05-13T01:31:02Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-0176" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://blog.0patch.com/2017/06/a-quick-analysis-of-microsofts.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://blog.fortinet.com/2017/05/11/deep-analysis-of-esteemaudit" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/msrc/2017/04/14/protecting-customers-and-evaluating-risk" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/4022747/security-update-for-windows-xp-and-windows-server-2003" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/98550" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/98752" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.