GHSA-Q2H7-93P4-2GQF
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-01-13 18:31 – Updated: 2026-01-13 18:31
VLAI?
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/xe/oa: Limit num_syncs to prevent oversized allocations
The OA open parameters did not validate num_syncs, allowing userspace to pass arbitrarily large values, potentially leading to excessive allocations.
Add check to ensure that num_syncs does not exceed DRM_XE_MAX_SYNCS, returning -EINVAL when the limit is violated.
v2: use XE_IOCTL_DBG() and drop duplicated check. (Ashutosh)
(cherry picked from commit e057b2d2b8d815df3858a87dffafa2af37e5945b)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-71076"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-01-13T16:16:07Z",
"severity": null
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ndrm/xe/oa: Limit num_syncs to prevent oversized allocations\n\nThe OA open parameters did not validate num_syncs, allowing\nuserspace to pass arbitrarily large values, potentially\nleading to excessive allocations.\n\nAdd check to ensure that num_syncs does not exceed DRM_XE_MAX_SYNCS,\nreturning -EINVAL when the limit is violated.\n\nv2: use XE_IOCTL_DBG() and drop duplicated check. (Ashutosh)\n\n(cherry picked from commit e057b2d2b8d815df3858a87dffafa2af37e5945b)",
"id": "GHSA-q2h7-93p4-2gqf",
"modified": "2026-01-13T18:31:05Z",
"published": "2026-01-13T18:31:05Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-71076"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/338849090ee610ff6d11e5e90857d2c27a4121ab"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b963636331fb4f3f598d80492e2fa834757198eb"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f8dd66bfb4e184c71bd26418a00546ebe7f5c17a"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…