ghsa-q3g8-363q-g9qq
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-24 17:36
Modified
2022-05-24 17:36
Details
An issue was discovered in picoTCP 1.7.0. The code for processing the IPv6 headers does not validate whether the IPv6 payload length field is equal to the actual size of the payload, which leads to an Out-of-Bounds read during the ICMPv6 checksum calculation, resulting in either Denial-of-Service or Information Disclosure. This affects pico_ipv6_extension_headers and pico_checksum_adder (in pico_ipv6.c and pico_frame.c).
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2020-17441" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-125" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2020-12-11T23:15:00Z", "severity": "CRITICAL" }, "details": "An issue was discovered in picoTCP 1.7.0. The code for processing the IPv6 headers does not validate whether the IPv6 payload length field is equal to the actual size of the payload, which leads to an Out-of-Bounds read during the ICMPv6 checksum calculation, resulting in either Denial-of-Service or Information Disclosure. This affects pico_ipv6_extension_headers and pico_checksum_adder (in pico_ipv6.c and pico_frame.c).", "id": "GHSA-q3g8-363q-g9qq", "modified": "2022-05-24T17:36:09Z", "published": "2022-05-24T17:36:09Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-17441" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://us-cert.cisa.gov/ics/advisories/icsa-20-343-01" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/815128" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.