GHSA-Q4PW-M5GM-WG9R
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-11 21:31 – Updated: 2026-09-13 09:32In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
sched/core: Make core-sched flips wait for in-flight selections
Core scheduling's pick_next_task() operates on all sibling rqs under one acquisition of the shared core-wide lock. A ->pick_task() that releases the rq lock leaves every sibling __lock momentarily free, letting __sched_core_flip(false) complete mid-selection and rebind rq_lockp() under it. The selection resumes on the split locks, touching sibling state it no longer protects, and __schedule() finally releases a lock that was never taken while leaking the one that was.
Count in-flight core-wide selections in the leader's rq->core_pick_in_flight and make __sched_core_flip() wait for the count to drain. The count only changes under the shared lock, which the flip holds while sampling, so no other ordering is needed. The wait can repeat while selections overlap, but the flip backs off between samples and flips are rare cookie-lifetime events.
sched_core_cpu_deactivate() moves the count to the new leader - a stale copy left behind would bias it forever if that CPU later returns as its own leader.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-89520"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-09-11T20:19:34Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nsched/core: Make core-sched flips wait for in-flight selections\n\nCore scheduling\u0027s pick_next_task() operates on all sibling rqs under one\nacquisition of the shared core-wide lock. A -\u003epick_task() that releases the\nrq lock leaves every sibling __lock momentarily free, letting\n__sched_core_flip(false) complete mid-selection and rebind rq_lockp() under\nit. The selection resumes on the split locks, touching sibling state it no\nlonger protects, and __schedule() finally releases a lock that was never\ntaken while leaking the one that was.\n\nCount in-flight core-wide selections in the leader\u0027s rq-\u003ecore_pick_in_flight\nand make __sched_core_flip() wait for the count to drain. The count only\nchanges under the shared lock, which the flip holds while sampling, so no\nother ordering is needed. The wait can repeat while selections overlap, but\nthe flip backs off between samples and flips are rare cookie-lifetime\nevents.\n\nsched_core_cpu_deactivate() moves the count to the new leader - a stale copy\nleft behind would bias it forever if that CPU later returns as its own\nleader.",
"id": "GHSA-q4pw-m5gm-wg9r",
"modified": "2026-09-13T09:32:16Z",
"published": "2026-09-11T21:31:30Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-89520"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/23eda24f325a6e6d686d30ec75f2e9d6745e2015"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9d69422ddaa13526c2223444e237d948d6e44728"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f3629c63a4af3e491381780bc6c123cb498c4c40"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.