ghsa-q586-r5vx-jgjf
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 01:58
Modified
2022-05-14 01:58
Severity ?
Details
An issue was discovered in OpenAFS before 1.6.23 and 1.8.x before 1.8.2. Several RPC server routines did not fully initialize their output variables before returning, leaking memory contents from both the stack and the heap. Because the OpenAFS cache manager functions as an Rx server for the AFSCB service, clients are also susceptible to information leakage. For example, RXAFSCB_TellMeAboutYourself leaks kernel memory and KAM_ListEntry leaks kaserver memory.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2018-16948" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-200" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2018-09-12T01:29:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "An issue was discovered in OpenAFS before 1.6.23 and 1.8.x before 1.8.2. Several RPC server routines did not fully initialize their output variables before returning, leaking memory contents from both the stack and the heap. Because the OpenAFS cache manager functions as an Rx server for the AFSCB service, clients are also susceptible to information leakage. For example, RXAFSCB_TellMeAboutYourself leaks kernel memory and KAM_ListEntry leaks kaserver memory.", "id": "GHSA-q586-r5vx-jgjf", "modified": "2022-05-14T01:58:19Z", "published": "2022-05-14T01:58:19Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-16948" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/09/msg00024.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2018/dsa-4302" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://openafs.org/pages/security/OPENAFS-SA-2018-002.txt" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.