GHSA-Q5J9-F95W-F4PR

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-12-05 06:30 – Updated: 2022-12-06 21:53
VLAI?
Summary
TERASOLUNA Server Framework vulnerable to ClassLoader manipulation
Details

TERASOLUNA Global Framework 1.0.0 (Public review version) and TERASOLUNA Server Framework for Java (Rich) 2.0.0.2 to 2.0.5.1 are vulnerable to ClassLoader manipulation due to using the old version of Spring Framework which contains the vulnerability. The vulnerability is caused by an improper input validation issue in the binding mechanism of Spring MVC. By the application processing a specially crafted file, arbitrary code may be executed with the privileges of the application.

When using TERASOLUNA Global Framework 1.0.0 (Public review version), update to TERASOLUNA Server Framework for Java 5.7.1.SP1 (using Spring Framework 5.3.18). This vulnerability alone can be addressed by updating to TERASOLUNA Global Framework 1.0.1 (using Spring Framework 3.2.10) or later.

Severity ?
7.8 (High)
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Maven",
        "name": "org.terasoluna.gfw:terasoluna-gfw-common"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "1.0.1.RELEASE"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-43484"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-20"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2022-12-05T23:23:07Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2022-12-05T04:15:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "TERASOLUNA Global Framework 1.0.0 (Public review version) and TERASOLUNA Server Framework for Java (Rich) 2.0.0.2 to 2.0.5.1 are vulnerable to ClassLoader manipulation due to using the old version of Spring Framework which contains the vulnerability. The vulnerability is caused by an improper input validation issue in the binding mechanism of Spring MVC. By the application processing a specially crafted file, arbitrary code may be executed with the privileges of the application. \n\nWhen using TERASOLUNA Global Framework 1.0.0 (Public review version), update to TERASOLUNA Server Framework for Java 5.7.1.SP1 (using Spring Framework 5.3.18). This vulnerability alone can be addressed by updating to TERASOLUNA Global Framework 1.0.1 (using Spring Framework 3.2.10) or later.",
  "id": "GHSA-q5j9-f95w-f4pr",
  "modified": "2022-12-06T21:53:44Z",
  "published": "2022-12-05T06:30:21Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-43484"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/issues/15724"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/terasolunaorg/terasoluna-gfw"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVN54728399/index.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://osdn.net/projects/terasoluna/wiki/cve-2022-43484"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://terasolunaorg.github.io/vulnerability/cve-2022-43484.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "TERASOLUNA Server Framework vulnerable to ClassLoader manipulation"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.