ghsa-q5j9-f95w-f4pr
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-12-05 06:30
Modified
2022-12-06 21:53
Severity ?
7.8 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Summary
TERASOLUNA Server Framework vulnerable to ClassLoader manipulation
Details

TERASOLUNA Global Framework 1.0.0 (Public review version) and TERASOLUNA Server Framework for Java (Rich) 2.0.0.2 to 2.0.5.1 are vulnerable to ClassLoader manipulation due to using the old version of Spring Framework which contains the vulnerability. The vulnerability is caused by an improper input validation issue in the binding mechanism of Spring MVC. By the application processing a specially crafted file, arbitrary code may be executed with the privileges of the application.

When using TERASOLUNA Global Framework 1.0.0 (Public review version), update to TERASOLUNA Server Framework for Java 5.7.1.SP1 (using Spring Framework 5.3.18). This vulnerability alone can be addressed by updating to TERASOLUNA Global Framework 1.0.1 (using Spring Framework 3.2.10) or later.

Show details on source website

To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Maven",
        "name": "org.terasoluna.gfw:terasoluna-gfw-common"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "1.0.1.RELEASE"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-43484"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-20"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2022-12-05T23:23:07Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2022-12-05T04:15:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "TERASOLUNA Global Framework 1.0.0 (Public review version) and TERASOLUNA Server Framework for Java (Rich) 2.0.0.2 to 2.0.5.1 are vulnerable to ClassLoader manipulation due to using the old version of Spring Framework which contains the vulnerability. The vulnerability is caused by an improper input validation issue in the binding mechanism of Spring MVC. By the application processing a specially crafted file, arbitrary code may be executed with the privileges of the application. \n\nWhen using TERASOLUNA Global Framework 1.0.0 (Public review version), update to TERASOLUNA Server Framework for Java 5.7.1.SP1 (using Spring Framework 5.3.18). This vulnerability alone can be addressed by updating to TERASOLUNA Global Framework 1.0.1 (using Spring Framework 3.2.10) or later.",
  "id": "GHSA-q5j9-f95w-f4pr",
  "modified": "2022-12-06T21:53:44Z",
  "published": "2022-12-05T06:30:21Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-43484"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/issues/15724"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/terasolunaorg/terasoluna-gfw"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVN54728399/index.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://osdn.net/projects/terasoluna/wiki/cve-2022-43484"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://terasolunaorg.github.io/vulnerability/cve-2022-43484.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "TERASOLUNA Server Framework vulnerable to ClassLoader manipulation"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.