GHSA-Q5M9-8685-C94F

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:37 – Updated: 2022-05-24 17:37
VLAI?
Details

Ptarmigan before 0.2.3 lacks API token validation, e.g., an "if (token === apiToken) {return true;} return false;" code block.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2019-16281"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-295"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2020-12-30T21:15:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Ptarmigan before 0.2.3 lacks API token validation, e.g., an \"if (token === apiToken) {return true;} return false;\" code block.",
  "id": "GHSA-q5m9-8685-c94f",
  "modified": "2022-05-24T17:37:34Z",
  "published": "2022-05-24T17:37:34Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-16281"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/nayutaco/ptarmigan/commit/37fd8f9da3bab9d323ddd77f2fd20b6dde8bcf6c"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/nayutaco/ptarmigan/compare/v0.2.2...v0.2.3"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/nayutaco/ptarmigan/releases/tag/v0.2.3"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…