ghsa-q685-268q-v69f
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-03 03:13
Modified
2022-05-03 03:13
Details
Integer overflow in the "Max-dotdot" CVS protocol command (serve_max_dotdot) for CVS 1.12.x through 1.12.8, and 1.11.x through 1.11.16, may allow remote attackers to cause a server crash, which could cause temporary data to remain undeleted and consume disk space.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2004-0417" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2004-08-06T04:00:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "Integer overflow in the \"Max-dotdot\" CVS protocol command (serve_max_dotdot) for CVS 1.12.x through 1.12.8, and 1.11.x through 1.11.16, may allow remote attackers to cause a server crash, which could cause temporary data to remain undeleted and consume disk space.", "id": "GHSA-q685-268q-v69f", "modified": "2022-05-03T03:13:01Z", "published": "2022-05-03T03:13:01Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2004-0417" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A1001" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A11145" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2004-June/022441.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=108716553923643\u0026w=2" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://security.e-matters.de/advisories/092004.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-200406-06.xml" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2004/dsa-519" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDKSA-2004:058" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2004-233.html" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.