ghsa-q7qj-9xh3-f579
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 01:46
Modified
2022-05-01 01:46
Details
Heap-based buffer overflow in psd.c for ImageMagick 6.1.0, 6.1.7, and possibly earlier versions allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a .PSD image file with a large number of layers.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2005-0005", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2005-05-02T04:00:00Z", severity: "HIGH", }, details: "Heap-based buffer overflow in psd.c for ImageMagick 6.1.0, 6.1.7, and possibly earlier versions allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a .PSD image file with a large number of layers.", id: "GHSA-q7qj-9xh3-f579", modified: "2022-05-01T01:46:49Z", published: "2022-05-01T01:46:49Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2005-0005", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A9925", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=110608222117215&w=2", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.debian.org/security/2005/dsa-646", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/glsa/glsa-200501-37.xml", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.idefense.com/application/poi/display?id=184&type=vulnerabilities", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2005-070.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2005-071.html", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.