ghsa-q7qj-9xh3-f579
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 01:46
Modified
2022-05-01 01:46
Details

Heap-based buffer overflow in psd.c for ImageMagick 6.1.0, 6.1.7, and possibly earlier versions allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a .PSD image file with a large number of layers.

Show details on source website


{
   affected: [],
   aliases: [
      "CVE-2005-0005",
   ],
   database_specific: {
      cwe_ids: [],
      github_reviewed: false,
      github_reviewed_at: null,
      nvd_published_at: "2005-05-02T04:00:00Z",
      severity: "HIGH",
   },
   details: "Heap-based buffer overflow in psd.c for ImageMagick 6.1.0, 6.1.7, and possibly earlier versions allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a .PSD image file with a large number of layers.",
   id: "GHSA-q7qj-9xh3-f579",
   modified: "2022-05-01T01:46:49Z",
   published: "2022-05-01T01:46:49Z",
   references: [
      {
         type: "ADVISORY",
         url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2005-0005",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A9925",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=110608222117215&w=2",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.debian.org/security/2005/dsa-646",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/glsa/glsa-200501-37.xml",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.idefense.com/application/poi/display?id=184&type=vulnerabilities",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2005-070.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2005-071.html",
      },
   ],
   schema_version: "1.4.0",
   severity: [],
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Security Advisory comment format.

This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.

UUIDv4 of the comment
UUIDv4 of the Vulnerability-Lookup instance
When the comment was created originally
When the comment was last updated
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
The identifier of the vulnerability (CVE ID, GHSA-ID, PYSEC ID, etc.).



Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.