ghsa-q7qj-9xh3-f579
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 01:46
Modified
2022-05-01 01:46
Details
Heap-based buffer overflow in psd.c for ImageMagick 6.1.0, 6.1.7, and possibly earlier versions allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a .PSD image file with a large number of layers.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2005-0005" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2005-05-02T04:00:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "Heap-based buffer overflow in psd.c for ImageMagick 6.1.0, 6.1.7, and possibly earlier versions allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a .PSD image file with a large number of layers.", "id": "GHSA-q7qj-9xh3-f579", "modified": "2022-05-01T01:46:49Z", "published": "2022-05-01T01:46:49Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2005-0005" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A9925" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=110608222117215\u0026w=2" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2005/dsa-646" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/glsa/glsa-200501-37.xml" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.idefense.com/application/poi/display?id=184\u0026type=vulnerabilities" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2005-070.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2005-071.html" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.