GHSA-Q7QJ-9XH3-F579
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 01:46 – Updated: 2022-05-01 01:46
VLAI?
Details
Heap-based buffer overflow in psd.c for ImageMagick 6.1.0, 6.1.7, and possibly earlier versions allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a .PSD image file with a large number of layers.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2005-0005"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2005-05-02T04:00:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Heap-based buffer overflow in psd.c for ImageMagick 6.1.0, 6.1.7, and possibly earlier versions allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a .PSD image file with a large number of layers.",
"id": "GHSA-q7qj-9xh3-f579",
"modified": "2022-05-01T01:46:49Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T01:46:49Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2005-0005"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A9925"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=110608222117215\u0026w=2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2005/dsa-646"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/glsa/glsa-200501-37.xml"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.idefense.com/application/poi/display?id=184\u0026type=vulnerabilities"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2005-070.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2005-071.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…